Quantcast
Channel: Question about interpretting an interaction term in a regression - Cross Validated
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Question about interpretting an interaction term in a regression

$
0
0

If I run the regression:

$y = \beta_o + \beta_1 * Black + \beta_2 Black*X + \eta$

where Black = 1 if the individual is black, and x is a continuous variable, and I am omitting x separately as a regressor, and $\eta$ is the error term. What exactly is the interpretation of $\beta_2$?

The way I see it there are two different ways to look at it:

  1. $\frac{dE[y|x,black=1]}{dx}$ = $\beta_2$

which is then the marginal effect of x on y for blacks, but also:

  1. Taking mean differnces: $E[y|x,black=1]-E[y|x,black=0]$ = $\beta_1 + \beta_2 x$,and then:

$\frac{d(E[y|x,black=1]-E[y|x,black=0])}{dx}$ = $\beta_2$

, which is now saying the mean difference between black and non black is changing with x. These seem like quite different interpretations. Is one of these logically incorrect?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Latest Images

Trending Articles





Latest Images